We publish the method in full. If you have the capacity, run it. The question isn't whether DIY works — it does. The question is whether your team has the bandwidth, and whether the math beats hiring us.
| On | Authority | DIY (your team) |
|---|---|---|
| Citation tracking | Weekly across 4 engines, 10–50 prompts. Live dashboard. Auto-baselined when LLM versions update. | 1–2 hours/week running prompts manually or via Otterly + interpreting results. |
| Content production | 4–16 optimized pages/month, AI-extractability rules built in. | 8–12 hours/month per page if you're new to AI-extractable structure. |
| Schema implementation | Done in month 1, ships with every new page after. | 3–5 hours/month maintaining + extending. |
| Earned mention outreach | 2–5 placements/month per tier. G2, Reddit, trade press. | 4–6 hours/month for one experienced PR person. |
| Reporting + monthly review | Done for you. Monthly Loom + dashboard. | 2–3 hours/month if your team is rigorous. |
| Total time per month | ●~30 min on Launch · ~1 hr on Growth · ~3 hrs on Authority | 19–28 hours / month |
At a $150/hour blended rate, 19–28 hours a month is $2,850–$4,200 in effort. That's already at or above Launch retainer pricing ($2,490) — and assumes you have someone with the right skills available, which is usually the bottleneck. Most $1–10M ARR SaaS marketing teams are full on existing work.
Authority is built specifically for the case where the math doesn't work in-house: where your one or two marketers are already at capacity, where adding a hire to do GEO would take 3 months and cost $80–120k/year fully loaded, and where the audit's 90-day roadmap is more useful as a delivery contract than as a checklist for someone who doesn't have time anyway.
If you can check all four, use the full method as a free playbook and run it yourself. We mean that. The audit is for the 90% of B2B SaaS that can't.
See also: vs SEO agencies, vs Profound.